Tag Archives: painting

Jost Münster and Wolfgang Flad 7.11 -21.11.2026 Preview Thursday 5.11.2026

Jost Münster

Limber #6, 2026; 91 x 63 cm; acrylic, wood,

New Paintings

Brought up in the region of Stuttgart and Ulm, centers of ‘contemporary’ industrial design, Műnster was aware of the seductive implications of fine surface and the mix of aerodynamic form and function as it integrated into experience of everyday life. The commercial and ideological appeal of commercially globalized style was regarded with suspicion in German contemporary painting, for example the ambivalence about the seductions of American Pop Art in work by Palermo and Richter, and the mythic gestural invocations of Penck, Kiefer, Beuys and Polke. For Munster this tension was itself a rich resource which painting could explore.

From the technological point of view, Münster enjoys a seductive potential in the investigation of tactile structures and the invention of useful forms. However, these could appear against disparate backgrounds, their perfectibility subject to decay and de-formation, unexpectedly displaced in use or accidental interventions found in daily life. An example could be the ‘hippy’ practice of re-decorating VW’s hi-tech spray-paint with brushed-on house paint. These contrasts offered playful possibilities: the power of the trademarked sign with the disruptive interventions of individually personalized preferences. This has been explored by Münster in many documentary photographs that informing practice at the level of seeking out interesting contrasts and rehearsing their meanings through a wide research of their distinctions and compatibilities.

Engagement with the experience of visual disparity brings unexpected and unconventional conjunctions to painting that have a classical modernist basis in experimental colour and textural interactions but extend to philosophical engagements with process, fabrication, materiality, and placement of the ‘construction’ of painting equally in practice and in installation. Munster adopts painting’s appeal to the imagination and illusion as a mobile proposition. For instance, the form of a painted shelf, in which the question of which is the image arises: the support or the thing, also a painting, placed upon it. Ordering, scale and sequence become questions of difference and repetition which, in turn, become interest in distinction. At this point the propositions of Munster’s work become seriously weighted, considered yet playfully open to further investigation.

The elements of illusion that result from constructive practice are subtly judged, inviting speculation about levels and progressions. Opticality weighs gravity, sensations of translucency and density, gestural diversions, pleasure in colours, their interactions and their codes, slight shifts in depths of surface that create shadow, or the introduction of painterly graduations that also create illusions of depth or precedence. Above all, the paintings allow a surprising optical eventfulness to become apparent.

Joan Key, London 2026

Blind Date I; 2018,220 x 145 cm; acrylic,bamboo,canvas
Limber #1;2026 ; acrylic, canvas, wood

Limber#8; 2026 ;130 x 11 cm; acrylic, canvas, wood

Wolfgang Flad

Xylem, 2024 ; 68 x 37 x 27cm ,Mixed media

Between Erosion and Emergence

Wolfgang Flad’s artistic practice explores the fluid boundaries between sculpture, relief and painting, drawing inspiration from the structures, rhythms and transformative processes of the natural world. Organic growth, erosion and geological stratification inform a visual language in which matter appears to evolve according to its own internal logic. His works evoke forms found in nature, from microscopic organisms and porous cellular structures to lunar landscapes and weathered rock formations, while remaining open to individual interpretation.

The sculptures, including works from the Xylem series, embody this dialogue between natural processes and artistic construction. Their sinuous, branching forms and intricate networks of cavities suggest organic systems of growth, circulation and interconnection. Solid matter and empty space become equally significant, inviting viewers to move around the sculptures and discover ever-changing perspectives, silhouettes and spatial relationships.

This interplay between material, perception and transformation continues in the Dust Paintings. Created from dust and residual material removed during the making of sculptures and reliefs, these works give discarded matter a new existence. Reassembled and built up in layers, the material forms richly textured surfaces that resemble eroded terrain, sedimentary deposits or fragments of an imagined geological landscape. The process establishes a cyclical relationship between creation and dissolution, in which what is removed from one work becomes the substance of another.

In The Dark Side of the Moon series, Flad translates the cratered surfaces of celestial bodies into tactile, abstract reliefs. Their shifting colours, textures and reflective qualities transform the act of looking into an active experience: depending on the viewer’s position and the changing light, different details emerge and recede.

Across these bodies of work, Flad reveals a form of natural logic in which erosion becomes creation, layering becomes accumulation, and transformation is never complete. Rather than presenting fixed images or definitive meanings, his works invite viewers to explore them physically and perceptually, discovering how colour, depth, texture and perspective continually reshape the encounter between artwork and observer.

Untitle (Dark Side Of The Moon); 2026; 33 x 25 x7 cm ; mixed media
Untitled; 2019; aluminium cast
Structure,2016; 60 x50 x 35 cm ; mixed media

Clem Crosby – Martina Geccelli

26.10.2024 – 9.10.2024 Preview 24.10.2024

Clem Crosby

http://www.clemcrosby.com

The emphasis is on the demotic line – a line anyone can make. The drawing could be thought of as expanded crayon mark-making – applied and reapplied so traces of the iterative process continually providing an armature on which to work. My painting is less about craft, and more about discovery, with each mark suggesting another, images collapsing and reappearing with the desire to continue the initial excitement of the first touch throughout the painting. 

Clem Crosby, October, 2024

‘…(these works) show a deep affinity with this organic ebb and flow of the field, merging and weaving, peaks, moments of intensity and vortices. Related to this is the direct motion of the whole – the unspooling of the form or gestures across the surface. This relates to a hinterland where drawing and writing relate’.                                                    

David Ryan, Clem Crosby – Between Surface and Event, Exhibition catalogue, University of Central Lancashire. 2018

Clem Crosby, The Apostate, 2017 Oil and oil bar on Dibond 65 × 48 ins (165 × 122 cm)


‘…Crosby used to paint monochromes, but in his more recent paintings, it is as if what earlier on would have been a single, all over colour complex, was being untied, it’s weave being opened up for inspection…. informality meets analytic intensity…. the closer they seem to fall apart, the better they are’

Barry Schwabsky, Artforum September 2011

Clem Crosby ,Black Baroque 2020
Oil and oil bar on Dibond mounted on aluminium sub frame
68 x 48 ins (173 x 122 cm)




Martina Geccelli

https://www.instagram.com/martinageccelli/

Martina Geccelli, Bow-Rind – Bowl, 2021 glazed ceramic

Shatters 

In Geccelli’s clay works, abstract forms arise from wild, often accidental growth. Over a base of discharged vessels, added elements moving fluidly. These pieces emerge from ‘accidents’; purpose-free parts holding the shambles together. A process of destruction and rejoining creates something resilient. Martina Geccelli seeks immediacy and emotion, forming unique sculptures by combining shapes. Listening to possibilities, she embraces accidental contexts where forms develop, risking further destruction after leaving the kiln. 

Similar so in Geccelli’s work with paper; from a single sheet crumbling and cuts form sculptures. When the sheet gets rejoined disorderly,  a sculptural form emerges.  

Her work accepts destruction, vulnerability, and odd results, an open process leading to one best choice. A composition is hard to see, its rather a growth, a movement- an absence of order. 
Beauty might emerge. 
 
It holds its personality – it is IT. 

Martina Geccelli, crumbled Paper , 2024
Martina Geccelli , Toppled 2, 2023 ceramic glazed

Heaps of broken
in between
hollowed vessel –
amidst
a hole in the clutter
adapting to space

Martina Geccelli, crumbled 2/2024 paper, paperclips, magnet

Mary Maclean and Jo McGonigal – September 2017

Mary Maclean, Campus #7

Mary Maclean 

Mary Maclean’s work in photography explores the intersections of spatial thought and the flux of things that are always on the move, even if captured in the apparently implacable, static, objecthood of the image. She is founder member of the curating group Outside Architecture and was a member of the collaborative artists project Five Years 2010 -2015. She is currently Senior Lecturer at the Royal Academy Schools.

Mary Maclean, Left of Place, A photographic installation exploring the space of borders and thresholds in the everyday structures within architectural environments.

Mary Maclean, Non-Coincidence

 

Mary Maclean, Outcomes may Vary # 1

 

 

 

Jo McGonigal

Jo McGonigal
Side (cadmium yellow deep) 2016

Jo McGonigal, Dirty Gold, 2016
(Lycra, pigment,wood)

Jo McGonigal  makes spatial paintings out of physical things in real space. The work begins with a visual analysis of historical Baroque painting (e.g. Poussin, Vermeer, etc.) as a basis for understanding painting, not as a fixed identity but as a specific spatial construction with a pictorial and spatial vocabulary. These observations became translated through the construction of three-dimensional spatial paintings as pictorial compositions that reconfigure the space and its architecture, using specific physical things. The exhibition space evolves the work through its spatial characteristics.  In using materials to imply formal and conceptual qualities of transparency, light, opacity, verticality, proximity, distance, McGonigal is dealing with in how they are used a vernacular of painting.

Jo McGonigal,
Close Looking (2015)
Oil on Lycra and Wood
35 x 10 x 7 cm

Jo McGonigal, Rectangles (2015)
Edge of a Silk Scarf / Perspex

Ian Kane and Eric Cruikshank – September 2016

Ian Kane

Ian Kane is a spatial artist working from his studio in Dalcross, near Inverness in the Scottish Highlands. He has exhibited nationally and internationally since studying Sculpture at Edinburgh College of Art and completing a post-graduate degree in the 1970s. A Scottish Young Contemporaries Prize-winner in 1984, his works have been shown in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands, France, Norway, Canada and Japan.

Ian Kane, Seeing is believing

Ian Kane, Seeing is believing

 

‘Curiosity and the spirit of enquiry into what exists is always the starting point for the work. This preoccupation with reflecting the truth of the world and our place in it is the work of the artist. The work changes as we ourselves change. The artist strives to find ways to produce the works that become signifiers of our time. The making of every piece is a re-learning; the bringing together of the conscious and the unconscious. Memory does not help here as the presentness of the work generates its own problems to be resolved’

https://spark.adobe.com/page/wcrwajr059abC/

 

Eric Cruikshank

As to the situation of the colours, the purest and strongest must be placed in front of the piece, and the colouring varied according to subject, time and place. If the subject be grave, melancholy or terrible, the general tint of the colouring must incline to brown or black, or red and gloomy; but it must be gay and pleasant in subjects of joy or triumph.

Encyclopedia Britannica or A Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, edited by William Smellie, Edinburgh 1771

Eric Cruikshank  Number 9 -  Deep-Scarlet-Red-Pomplean-Red; 2016 Coloured Pencil on Paper, 19 cm x 28cm

Eric Cruikshank Number 9 – Deep-Scarlet-Red-Pomplean-Red; 2016 Coloured Pencil on Paper, 19 cm x 28cm

The Scottish artist Eric Cruikshank is a modern painter. Born in a country and into a culture with a strong narrative tradition, his work departs from customary figuration, yet revels in the craft and artisanship of his chosen medium. Instead of portraying famous men, it analyses the qualities of colour and light. Instead of imitating landscapes, it explores notions of painterly space. And instead of illustrating stories, it investigates the process of painting itself. More than anything, this approach relies on the individual viewer. Our perceptions of colour, light and space are not only dependent on the painting – they are just as much dependent on the conditions in which we perceive it. Changes in lighting, spatial arrangement, distance to the object, subjective mood of the beholder and even the time spent with the artwork, become constituting factors in understanding it. Instead of a mere consumer of a pre-packaged story, the beholder becomes participant observer.

 

Eric Cruikshank, Number 3; Light-Yellow-Glaze-Warm-Grey-II; 2016, Coloured Pencil on Paper; 19cm 28 cm.

Eric Cruikshank, Number 3; Light-Yellow-Glaze-Warm-Grey-II; 2016, Coloured Pencil on Paper; 19cm 28 cm.

Peter Abrahams – Martin Streit, paintings and photography

Installation views RAUMX London    8.07 – 16.07.2016

opening times Saturday 2 – 6pm

and by appointment

raumx@mgeccelli1.plus.com

Preview – Thursday 7.07.2016

from 6 pm

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016

Martin Streit and Peter Abrahams, installation, Raum X London, July 2016