Tag Archives: sculpture

Ben Joiner Nikola Ukic

25.10.2025 – 8.11.2025

Preview Thursday 23.10.2025

Nikola Ukic All I Have I Gave, 2024 Variable dimesions, spongy polyurethane, iron
Ben Joiner Installation. ‘The Edge’ OVADA Oxford 2024.

Ben Joiner

Ben Joiner’s practice explores sculptural process and form. Works have involved casting and evisceration, fabrication and simulation.

Joiner’s approach encapsulates — through a process of abstraction — the formative and experiential. 

Works relate to absence and presence, and are an attempt to make palpable connections between these contrasting experiences. 

A number of sculptures have been incorporated into location based films, a series titled ‘Between the shadow and the reflection’. 

Each film records the dropping and subsequent destruction of a piece of work. Shot in slow motion, the films extend the time between release and impact. The resulting footage is both documentation and representation. 

Ben Joiner “Between-the Shadow and the Reflection”-February-2025. Still image

The videos capture anticipation and expectation — the expected impact and the inevitable damage — and explore the processes of production and destruction and present the possibility of restoration.

Ben Joiner Studio Installation 2025

https://www.benjoinersculptor.co.uk

Nikola Ukic

Nikola Ukic, Symmetry of time 2007-2021
acrylic blobs on the old catalog pages
28 x 40 cm

Through his exploration of materials and forms, Ukić creates space for the uncontrollable. Rather than encouraging us to change the world through direct messages, he invites us to change the way we perceive it. At a time when art often serves as a form of social analysis, his work reminds us that true freedom does not lie in choosing sides but in the ability to endure contradiction.

Nikola Ukic,  Untitled, 2023, 110 x 160 x 49 cm, spongy polyurethane, iron

In Ukić’s works, there is a struggle for the body and its identity or identities. His sculptures are often trunk-like structures that seem to lack extremities. In humans, the extremities act as the movement apparatus and thus as executor of their actions. The human torso, however, is the seat of the organs, of the collection and exchange of energy, the inner or hidden propulsion of all activities. Its arching and contracting are the basic activities of life. The to and fro of this movement routine is articulated by Ukić’s sculptures. They engage the artist’s body and the viewer’s to wrestle with the emerging body in a kind of fictional interaction and at the same time as an artificial natural process. Several ambivalences emerge from this struggle: the ambivalence between an intrinsic and a random becoming of a form, the sensory signs of heaviness and at the same time the lightness or even weightlessness of the resulting structure. Is the expansion of the emerging shape free of gravity in the course of its execution, can it free itself from a reference to the ground? If we look purely at the surfaces, this lack of gravity seems to be prevalent. This is the reason why Ukić sometimes only works with surfaces, with foil as something barely tangible, its thinness as a sign of voidance, which is often intended to protect surfaces in our world of goods, but is itself negligently thrown away. Ukić also raises the question of the carrier material of the foil and its value. In order to be able to remove films, intermediate layers are sometimes required that appear negligible because they are only made for the brief moment of removal. Ukić is interested here in the level on which meaning is created: on the tangible level of materiality or on an intangible intermediate level?

By concentrating on surfaces, he also focuses on the tautness of human skin. In many of his sculptures, there is on the one hand the plumpness that stems from expansion, and at the same time a brittleness at the joints or kinking edges, which also comes about through expansion. One might think that Ukić is concerned here with the deconstruction of the medium in general. However, he is fascinated when in a process something completely different gets transported and conveyed.

Excerpt Rolf Hengesbach

https://www.nikola-ukic.com/

Clem Crosby – Martina Geccelli

26.10.2024 – 9.10.2024 Preview 24.10.2024

Clem Crosby

http://www.clemcrosby.com

The emphasis is on the demotic line – a line anyone can make. The drawing could be thought of as expanded crayon mark-making – applied and reapplied so traces of the iterative process continually providing an armature on which to work. My painting is less about craft, and more about discovery, with each mark suggesting another, images collapsing and reappearing with the desire to continue the initial excitement of the first touch throughout the painting. 

Clem Crosby, October, 2024

‘…(these works) show a deep affinity with this organic ebb and flow of the field, merging and weaving, peaks, moments of intensity and vortices. Related to this is the direct motion of the whole – the unspooling of the form or gestures across the surface. This relates to a hinterland where drawing and writing relate’.                                                    

David Ryan, Clem Crosby – Between Surface and Event, Exhibition catalogue, University of Central Lancashire. 2018

Clem Crosby, The Apostate, 2017 Oil and oil bar on Dibond 65 × 48 ins (165 × 122 cm)


‘…Crosby used to paint monochromes, but in his more recent paintings, it is as if what earlier on would have been a single, all over colour complex, was being untied, it’s weave being opened up for inspection…. informality meets analytic intensity…. the closer they seem to fall apart, the better they are’

Barry Schwabsky, Artforum September 2011

Clem Crosby ,Black Baroque 2020
Oil and oil bar on Dibond mounted on aluminium sub frame
68 x 48 ins (173 x 122 cm)




Martina Geccelli

https://www.instagram.com/martinageccelli/

Martina Geccelli, Bow-Rind – Bowl, 2021 glazed ceramic

Shatters 

In Geccelli’s clay works, abstract forms arise from wild, often accidental growth. Over a base of discharged vessels, added elements moving fluidly. These pieces emerge from ‘accidents’; purpose-free parts holding the shambles together. A process of destruction and rejoining creates something resilient. Martina Geccelli seeks immediacy and emotion, forming unique sculptures by combining shapes. Listening to possibilities, she embraces accidental contexts where forms develop, risking further destruction after leaving the kiln. 

Similar so in Geccelli’s work with paper; from a single sheet crumbling and cuts form sculptures. When the sheet gets rejoined disorderly,  a sculptural form emerges.  

Her work accepts destruction, vulnerability, and odd results, an open process leading to one best choice. A composition is hard to see, its rather a growth, a movement- an absence of order. 
Beauty might emerge. 
 
It holds its personality – it is IT. 

Martina Geccelli, crumbled Paper , 2024
Martina Geccelli , Toppled 2, 2023 ceramic glazed

Heaps of broken
in between
hollowed vessel –
amidst
a hole in the clutter
adapting to space

Martina Geccelli, crumbled 2/2024 paper, paperclips, magnet

SHIFT – Martina Geccelli and Shawn Stipling – 21.09 – 6.10.2018 – Preview Thursday 20.09. from 6 pm

During September – October 2018 for the first time since RAUMX opened the director  Martina Geccelli will show together with Shawn Stipling at the projectspace. Both artists will show recent works which show new aspects of their work. In that sense they both make use of the actual meaning of projectspace as in trying new grounds.

Shawn Stipling
Aluminium 2

Martina Geccelli
Ceramic- colour,2018
18 x 14 x 15 cm

Shawn Stipling

My work is often very sparse in its content. The elements I use are minimised until only that which is ‘active’ remains. This reduction is essential as it allows for greater control over each of these elements and, crucially, allows me to eliminate any accident in favour of ‘conscious choice’. The precision is also functional; further emphasising that even details, of sometimes only one millimetre or less, are intentional and not the result of chance. Creating a situation where the viewer is fully aware that every nuance has been considered and is not the outcome of a serendipitous act.

I choose imagery associated with human activity, rather than that which pertains to the natural environment, as I wish to communicate in a very direct and, as I see it, very ‘human’ way. I am interested in the connections we make with others through the things we create – art, music, architecture…, and how these connections can be based on the tiniest of details. I find that the knowledge of these details being created specifically and ’intentionally’ by the artist, composer, architect…, rather than by random occurrences, produces an intensely intimate connection enhanced by the unambiguous nature of the expression.                                 Shawn Stipling 2018

Shawn Stipling
182,2016

 

Martina Geccelli

As a sculptor Martina Geccelli has, for the last 20 years, predominantly been working with photography. In taking photographs of domestic and simple objects she explores spacial relationships; the interdependence of objects to space, colour and light. Over the years, the works have evolved; moving through narrative and abstraction to nonobjective works. To further explore the potential of nonobjective consciousness, necessitated a return to the haptic engagement with material of sculpture and painting,

Working with basic materials, paper or clay, paint and glaze, she further defines her concerns in spacial orientation. Employing the interplay of line, shapes and colour she has developed exciting sensual images.                                                                                                  S. Charalambou

Martina Geccelli
Vertikal-bunt,2018

Martina Geccelli
Ceramic-white, 2017
23 x 17 x 12 cm

Shawn Stipling
Aluminium 4

Shawn Stipling
Aluminium 3, 2018

Martina Geccelli
Curves,b.o.g; 2018
Acrylic on paper

Ian Kane and Eric Cruikshank – September 2016

Ian Kane

Ian Kane is a spatial artist working from his studio in Dalcross, near Inverness in the Scottish Highlands. He has exhibited nationally and internationally since studying Sculpture at Edinburgh College of Art and completing a post-graduate degree in the 1970s. A Scottish Young Contemporaries Prize-winner in 1984, his works have been shown in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands, France, Norway, Canada and Japan.

Ian Kane, Seeing is believing

Ian Kane, Seeing is believing

 

‘Curiosity and the spirit of enquiry into what exists is always the starting point for the work. This preoccupation with reflecting the truth of the world and our place in it is the work of the artist. The work changes as we ourselves change. The artist strives to find ways to produce the works that become signifiers of our time. The making of every piece is a re-learning; the bringing together of the conscious and the unconscious. Memory does not help here as the presentness of the work generates its own problems to be resolved’

https://spark.adobe.com/page/wcrwajr059abC/

 

Eric Cruikshank

As to the situation of the colours, the purest and strongest must be placed in front of the piece, and the colouring varied according to subject, time and place. If the subject be grave, melancholy or terrible, the general tint of the colouring must incline to brown or black, or red and gloomy; but it must be gay and pleasant in subjects of joy or triumph.

Encyclopedia Britannica or A Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, edited by William Smellie, Edinburgh 1771

Eric Cruikshank  Number 9 -  Deep-Scarlet-Red-Pomplean-Red; 2016 Coloured Pencil on Paper, 19 cm x 28cm

Eric Cruikshank Number 9 – Deep-Scarlet-Red-Pomplean-Red; 2016 Coloured Pencil on Paper, 19 cm x 28cm

The Scottish artist Eric Cruikshank is a modern painter. Born in a country and into a culture with a strong narrative tradition, his work departs from customary figuration, yet revels in the craft and artisanship of his chosen medium. Instead of portraying famous men, it analyses the qualities of colour and light. Instead of imitating landscapes, it explores notions of painterly space. And instead of illustrating stories, it investigates the process of painting itself. More than anything, this approach relies on the individual viewer. Our perceptions of colour, light and space are not only dependent on the painting – they are just as much dependent on the conditions in which we perceive it. Changes in lighting, spatial arrangement, distance to the object, subjective mood of the beholder and even the time spent with the artwork, become constituting factors in understanding it. Instead of a mere consumer of a pre-packaged story, the beholder becomes participant observer.

 

Eric Cruikshank, Number 3; Light-Yellow-Glaze-Warm-Grey-II; 2016, Coloured Pencil on Paper; 19cm 28 cm.

Eric Cruikshank, Number 3; Light-Yellow-Glaze-Warm-Grey-II; 2016, Coloured Pencil on Paper; 19cm 28 cm.